(Answered) PRAC-6540-25 Week 6: Assignment 1 COMPLEX CASE STUDY PRESENTATION

This week you participate in the second of four clinical discussions called grand rounds. In one of these 4 weeks, you will be a presenter as well as help facilitate the online discussion; in the others you will be an active discussion participant. When it is your week to present, you will create a focused SOAP note and a short didactic (teaching) video presenting a real (but de-identified) complex patient case from your practicum experience.

 

You should have received communication from your Instructor letting you know which week of the course you are assigned to present.

Week 6 Participants:

BY DAY 7

Respond at least two times each to both of your colleagues who presented this week in the discussion forum. The goal is for the discussion forum to function as robust clinical conferences on the patients. Provide a response to one of the three discussion prompts that your colleague provided in his or her video presentation in the discussion forum. You may also provide additional information, alternative points of view, research to support treatment, or patient education strategies you might use with the relevant patient.

Rubric

PRAC_6540_Week6_Grand_Rounds_Participant_Discussion_Rubric
PRAC_6540_Week6_Grand_Rounds_Participant_Discussion_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Responses

85 to >76.0 Pts

Excellent
Responses exhibit synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Responses demonstrate synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are thoroughly addressed. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English.

76 to >67.0 Pts

Good
Responses exhibit critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are addressed. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English.

67 to >59.0 Pts

Fair
Responses are on topic and may have some depth. Responses may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and only one or no credible sources are cited. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are inadequately addressed.

59 to >0 Pts

Poor
Responses may not be on topic and lack depth. No credible sources are cited. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to colleagues’ prompts/questions are missing.
85 pts
Participation

15 to >13.0 Pts

Excellent
Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week. Responses are carried out over multiple days between Days 4 and 7.

13 to >11.0 Pts

Good
Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, over at least two days.

11 to >10.0 Pts

Fair
Participants respond at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, but responses may occur all in one day.

10 to >0 Pts

Poor
Does not meet requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week.
15 pts
Total points: 100
× How can I help you?